Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   

Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.

Find a Flat

Find your ideal flat (or the perfect flatmate) on the Accomm-
odation Offered and the Accommodation Wanted discussion boards.

NB perfect flatmates are not guaranteed.

Glamour

Glamour
The legendary Glamorous Solicitor showcases the style, the beauty and the sophistication for which the legal profession is so rightly known.
Syndicate  

Europe News

Send Us Your News
Exclusive: Lawyers at Baker & McKenzie to work an extra 100 hours a year
18 January 2013
Rate it
0

Baker & McKenzie's associates will be expected to work even harder this year, after the firm increased its target hours for 2013 from 1,600 to 1,700 for 2013.

RollOnFriday mathematicians have bashed their calculators to try and put that into perspective:
  • Taking away weekends, 25 days' holiday and eight bank holidays: associates will be working roughly 227 days.
  • With 1,600 hour targets this works out at 7 billable hours per day, and with 1,700 that's 7.48 billable hours per day.
  • So that means associates will need to spend an extra of 29 minutes per day fee earning.
So half an hour's extra billing a day. And how much extra pay for that? Errr, nothing obviously.

    Some cost / benefit analysis yesterday

1700 is a fairly hefty target. Berwin Leighton Paisner asks its associates to bill 1500, Ashurst 1600. Hogan Lovells has a target of 1700 and Magic Circle power house Allen & Overy expects its lawyers to bill 1750, so Bakers is edging towards platinum City hours.

But it's not just an issue for B&M, as major law firms are generally increasing their billable hour targets. As clients focus on getting more value from their lawyers and put more pressure on fees, so law firms have to respond. This means both cutting costs (hence the recent slew of redundancies) and demanding more from the lawyers that remain (another example being Scots firm Maclay Murray & Spens).

A spokesman for Bakers said "we aim to have a world class, high performing culture at every level of our business and this move is consistent with that".

But what about that lack of a pay rise? The firm said "we will review salary bands in July and will work hard to ensure that our salaries are competitive and that our trainees and associates are well-rewarded for the work they do". So definitely nothing then.
 

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
18/01/2013 08:50
Rate it
3
Report as offensive
This seems inevitable. Firms have cut back on everything they can think of, they have marketed like crazy to clients to little extra effect and even thrown out coasting partners, and of course have/and still are chucking out staff and junior lawyers to reduce costs. They can't raise rates much either in this climate. What is left to boost the bottom line? The only thing is billable time. I think if low growth in the UK continues we can see billable targets slowly increasing year by year until only true workaholics survive. But most firms won't care about that as there are a surplus of lawyers chasing a shrinking number of good legal jobs. Ah...brave new world...
anonymous user
18/01/2013 09:26
Rate it
44
Report as offensive
Alternatively, the partners at B & M could simply make a slightly less obscene amount of money.....
anonymous user
18/01/2013 09:35
Rate it
23
Report as offensive
Great, so the clients (who will often have in-house teams that are farming work out to the likes of B&M for their expertise in a particular area) will be paying more for mentally exhausted lawyers whilst the partners and ersatz 'professionals' at the top of the firms spend their time doing fruitless marketing which the actual performance will seldom live up to.

It doesn't matter what you pay people - the human brain can only handle so much and I'm not keen on instructing a bunch of malfunctioning, overworked droids.
anonymous user
18/01/2013 10:41
Rate it
20
Report as offensive
Increasing the number of billable hours is a blunt instrument. It reduces the incentive to work efficiently in the knowledge that the lawyer has to pack his or her time sheet each day come what may in order to satisfy his or her annual billiable hours target. Time sheets start to become works of fiction and clients with any sophistication know this.
anonymous user
18/01/2013 11:43
Rate it
4
Report as offensive
true what the posters say above, it is a blunt instrument and may backfire if clients start to see poor work or padding.

also, as the billable hour is slowly reduced as a way of billing clients how will partners manage this process of forcing up hours on fixed fee/success fee projects without it becoming farcical?
anonymous user
18/01/2013 12:43
Rate it
10
Report as offensive
Partner greed. There is no other explanation for it.
anonymous user
18/01/2013 16:52
Rate it
10
Report as offensive
I've worked for one of the Firm's mentioned above and in my experience the requirements are much more than you have stated. I mean how else are the Partner's going to continue to get by with bread and water oh and the £50k holidays that they like to have!
anonymous user
18/01/2013 20:44
Rate it
-9
Report as offensive
Latham & Watkins targets are 1900 and are easily met. 1500 is lazy by comparison.
anonymous user
19/01/2013 20:06
Rate it
-6
Report as offensive
Nothing wrong with £50,000 holidays. Trust me, they are properly earned.
anonymous user
22/01/2013 17:31
Rate it
6
Report as offensive
White & Case has raised its billable target by 50 hours every year for 3-4 years now and the pay has decreased for NQ's and has moved to a new system which in large equals less money for most associates. Bottom line, everyone is doing it.

And to the guy who says 1500 is a chump target. Clearly a banking lawyer who redlines credit agreements and debentures all day, not doing real law. Try litigating 1900 hours where you can only bill 2/3 your time.

Weekly Email Update

To receive a weekly European email update, please login or register to RollOnFriday.