Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.
  

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   
  

Glamour

Glamour
The legendary Glamorous Solicitor showcases the style, the beauty and the sophistication for which the legal profession is so rightly known.
  
  

Europe News

Send Us Your News
Media storm over "outrageous" law exam question
07 June 2013
Rate it
12

A Cambridge University law exam has caused a furore in the national press because of its explicit content.

200 undergraduates sitting their criminal law paper were asked to consider the offences committed at a fictional Cambridge college drinking society. The question posits a familiar student scenario in which a female student tricks one man into getting gobbled by another man, bums a second man with a bottle and rips off a third's pubic hair, resulting in an infection and untimely death.

    Sandra may have issues
 
Media outlets including the Daily Mail, The Sun and The Telegraph have all spun the story as an outrage, using frothing tweets from non-law students ("horrific - beyond acceptable") to bolster their case.

However, as Cambridge student mag The Tab reports, the law students themselves were largely unfazed, no doubt thanks to their familiarity with R v Brown. One Christs student even admitted "I liked the question. The circumstances felt familiar, and that was a comfort in the stressful atmosphere of an exam room".

A University spokesman forced to defend the paper said "hypothetical situations are presented in order to test students' understanding of different aspects of Criminal Law", before hurrying home clutching a two litre bottle of Pepsi and a tub of Veet.

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
07/06/2013 08:00
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
It's standard for a crim law exam in 1st year. I don't see why the media is going nuts over it. Hell, I've seen worse.

anonymous user
07/06/2013 09:17
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Is the answer sexual assault, sexual assault and assault? I'm not a lawyer unfortunately...
anonymous user
07/06/2013 09:47
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
I know it's wrong to answer a question with a question, but...

Describe Sandra's norks.
anonymous user
07/06/2013 09:49
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
I really want to know what offences have been committed? Anyone prepared to answer?
anonymous user
07/06/2013 10:12
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
One Christs student even admitted "I liked the question. The circumstances felt familiar......" = likes being bummed by a bottle
anonymous user
07/06/2013 10:32
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Sexual Assault x 2, plus one arguable GBH / maybe ABH.

Query whether in latter case there's a murder \ manslaughter argument (there is but will fail).

Sandra can be done for various conspiracies to [x], joint enterprises etc.

Basics.
anonymous user
07/06/2013 10:37
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Why do universities draft questions like that:

Consider what offences, if any, have been committed.


If I write "ok", do I get full marks?


Do you really need the "consider" bit?
Stratcat
07/06/2013 11:48
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Some people out there really are quite warped. We have criminal law exams because crime actually does take place. Are we to ignore it or not allow prospective criminal lawyers to be tested on such issues because they are "rude" (gasp)? I also agree with OldDude, when was the last time there was a "furore" about a question in which someone was murdered?

I didn't do much on sexual offences. The first two are sexual assaults, second could also be battery. The third could be gross negligence manslaughter but you'd have to consider whether the victim's actions broke the chain of causation. I think this would come down to whether it was foreseeable that the victim would be too embarrassed to seek medical attention. If not, then I guess it would amount to GBH.
anonymous user
07/06/2013 11:55
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Have I read this right? "circumstances felt familiar, and that was a comfort "! LOL
anonymous user
07/06/2013 12:08
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Does anyone have Sandra's number? Anyone?
anonymous user
07/06/2013 12:35
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
*joins Vizards*
anonymous user
07/06/2013 12:41
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
The Vizards.

Top LADs.
anonymous user
07/06/2013 13:17
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
I'm sure the Daily Mail are just annoyed there doesn't seem to be foreigner they can blame it all on.
anonymous user
07/06/2013 18:16
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Seems that the former News of the World journalists have now turned to setting exam questions.
anonymous user
10/06/2013 13:57
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Presumably why there has never been a series called Midsomer Rapes.
3-ducks
11/06/2013 12:30
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Sensationalist nonsense. It's good to make exam questions amusing, but this sort of violent imagery adds nothing. It's just dumbing down.
anonymous user
12/06/2013 18:38
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
I was actually asked in my universty entrance interview, as a callow 18 yr old, "Can a woman rape a man"? I'm sure part of the reason for the question was to see if I flinched. The answer then, as I recall, was no (rape could only be man on woman) but it has been redefined in statute since so the answer now would be yes. (I got in, thanks for asking)
anonymous user
14/06/2013 11:44
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Its just a hypothetical situation. I really don't see why everybody is so upset, considering the fact that real cases can often be far, FAR! worse. These students, answering this question will have to deal with those real cases in the future.
anonymous user
17/07/2013 19:57
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
anonymous user 12/06/2013 18:38 - afraid I'm a little late to the party, but no, rape has not been redefined. It's still the penile penetration of an orifice without the penetratee's consent. No penis, no rape...
  

Weekly Email Update

To receive a weekly European email update, please login or register to RollOnFriday.