Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   

Results

Find out how your firm did in the RollOnFriday UK Firm of the Year and Australian Firm of the Year surveys 2012.

All the News

All the News
Check out this week's news for all the gossip on who's doing what, with whom and for how much.

Find a Flat

Find your ideal flat (or the perfect flatmate) on the Accomm-
odation Offered and the Accommodation Wanted discussion boards.

NB perfect flatmates are not guaranteed.

Make Me...

...an offer I can't refuse. Put your details on Make Me An Offer and let top law firms come and offer you jobs. It's confidential, anonymous and free.
Syndicate  

Top 10 Cases

Send News
Fraudsters' convictions rendered unsafe as juror texts during trial
28 October 2011
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating

The conviction of a pair of Brighton businessmen who pocketed £1 million in ticket sales for a notorious Christmas attraction has been judged unsafe after a juror was discovered texting during the trial.

The Mears brothers, Victor and Henry, were banged up for 13 months in March this year for their role in setting up the notorious crappy Lapland New Forest attraction in 2008. RollOnFriday readers will no doubt remember the festive farrago, where punters paid £30 a head for a magical Christmas experience of crisp snow, twinkling lights and red-nosed reindeer - but were greeted with mud, cruddy strings of fairy lights and some miserable huskies. It closed after 5,000 complaints and a Christmas elf got punched in the face by an irate parent.

    A winter wonderland, courtesy of Victor and Henry Mears

Victor and Henry were prosecuted by Dorset Trading Standards at Bristol Crown Court, and sent down after being found guilty on eight counts of misleading advertising. However it now appears the whole process was prejudiced by one juror, who admits texting her partner in the public gallery as she sat in the jury box.

In particular she received one text from her boyfriend which was simply the word "guilty". That sort of thing doesn't go down well in court, although the juror later attempted to explain away the message as her boyfriend's apology for eating a full English breakfast whilst on a diet. Which should stand up well in her contempt of court hearing.

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
28/10/2011 09:17
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating
Report as offensive
"£30 a hear"? tsk
Shooty*
28/10/2011 11:58
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating
Report as offensive
Jurors are cretins. 97.5% of the population, roughly, are cretins nowadays. Juries belong in an age where people took things seriously, had attention spans longer than a Jedward record, and weren't hooked on sh1te TV.

They are an anachronism and should be done away with.
anonymous user
28/10/2011 12:36
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating
Report as offensive
You forgot to mention that you are one of the few non-cretins on this planet.

Well done luv x
anonymous user
28/10/2011 13:19
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating
Report as offensive
*shrug*
I never claimed that.
anonymous user
02/11/2011 16:39
Rate it
Negitive Rating
0
Positive Rating
Report as offensive
And no-one noticed her texting at the time?