Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   

Discussion

Discussion
The discussion board has the answers to all life's questions. Get advice on how to get a job, where to work, how your salary matches up and where to go after hours.

Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.
Syndicate  

Top Stories 2012

Send Us Your News
Firm offers to fund LPCs for paralegals and promises 60 training contracts
22 June 2012
Rate it
1

In an unusual offering to graduates, law firm Aston Carter is offering "paralegal employment opportunities" in its London office, which come with the promise of a funded LPC and up to 60 training contracts. All candidates need to do is enrol on a £9,500 paralegal course.

For the last week, the RollOnFriday discussion board has been abuzz with speculation about Aston Carter's paralegal scheme, which was first reported by Legal Cheek. According to the firm's employment pack (which has since been removed from its website), Aston Carter is offering the following:

1. A bespoke 6 month paralegal training scheme at a cost to the employee of £9,500.
2. Permanent, full-time employment after the paralegal course on £15-18,000 p.a.
3. Fully funded part time LPC (completed whilst the paralegal works full time at Aston Carter)
4. Up to 60 training contracts for the "right" employees.

So that's £9.5k outlay for a paralegal course rather than a £13.5k spend on an LPC, and apparently there's the possibility of a training contract at the end. So the maths might make sense, but the details of Aston Carter's scheme are rather less clear.

To put the promise of up to 60 training contracts into perspective, Aston Carter currently has just five lawyers on its website (and only four registered to the firm on the Law Society). It has SRA approval to take on only two trainees, and currently it has none. When RollOnFriday asked Aston Carter how it could support 60 training contracts, a spokesman said that the firm was expanding rapidly and would have 30 lawyers in the next two years. But no indication was given of where the work would come from to feed these new mouths.

Aston Carter has said that an independent organisation, Interedwise, is providing the facilities and tutors for the course and will receive the full £9.5k fees. But according to its website, Interedwise is a company which matches up overseas students with college courses and appears to run no courses of its own. RollOnFriday has been unable to get in contact with anyone at Interedwise.

To further add to the oddness, the firm has been trumpeting APIL and LEXCEL accreditations that it does not have. When RollOnFriday asked the firm about the accreditation it claimed that a member of the team was an APIL "resolution member" and that it had been "recommended" for LEXCEL accreditation. Aston Carter has now removed references to both accreditations.

    Spot the difference

The firm claims that 30 individuals have already signed up to this course. Anyone who would like to share their experience of the arrangements can get in touch (on a no names basis) at the usual place.


Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
22/06/2012 09:36
Rate it
7
Report as offensive
*sniggers*
anonymous user
22/06/2012 09:50
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
the profession is really going to the dogs.

bet the SRA/Law Soc will catch up with this in about two years or so long after the damage has been done.
anonymous user
22/06/2012 10:01
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
30 already?
anonymous user
22/06/2012 13:44
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
I am sure that the interviews were quite gruelling and that no prospective paralegal was asked to bring their cheque books with them to the interview. *cough*
anonymous user
22/06/2012 15:26
Rate it
3
Report as offensive
60 TCs is the same as Eversheds and 5 more than Ashursts according to the stats on the Lawyer2B website...
anonymous user
22/06/2012 16:37
Rate it
6
Report as offensive
Not sure about everyone else but I would love the chance to work with the Senior Partner, Henry Telewa.

He is an incredibly bright, cerebral lawyer, who has been described by professional and lay clients alike as possessing an extraordinarily robust wealth of knowledge of criminal law and practice direction. He has an uncanny ability to relate to a wide variety of social contracts in a way few other advocates can and thus is able to achieve unprecedented coverage within practice sectors.

According to his website.
anonymous user
22/06/2012 16:41
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
Regulatory problem here? Their website does not say "authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority"
Laura @ RoF
22/06/2012 16:49
Rate it
-1
Report as offensive
At the bottom of the website:

Birmingham Office Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No: 510496
London Office Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No: 535401
anonymous user
23/06/2012 00:07
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
This sounds suspiciously like Aston Carter's expansion plan -
http://www.totallylegal.com/show_job.cgi?j=9262675&cat=24&ro=&l=&e=year&k=paralegal&lo=London&a=31&radius=1600&so=&ls=&sids=1&seids=&srpg=2
anonymous user
23/06/2012 15:26
Rate it
-1
Report as offensive
Laura, sorry to make this rather sad point, but I believe the new SRA requirement is that firms describe themselves as both "regulated" and "authorised" by the SRA - I know my firm changed its letterhead a few months ago to this effect, as it previously only said "regulated". I wouldn't say it's a big regulatory problem, but a little clumsy and slow.
anonymous user
23/06/2012 20:39
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Reminds me of this film: http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0181984/
anonymous user
24/06/2012 08:36
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
The random capitalisation and apostrophe use on the firm's website is rather less than cerebral.
anonymous user
24/06/2012 17:17
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
Anonymous 23/06/2012 15:26 - RoF speaks....Aston Carter corrects.

Seriously, I feel sorry for Mr Pubill their Marketing Executive. He really has his work cut out for him.